So, I got a call from the nice HR lady at my old job. I may be doing some temp work at the old place again, at least for 2 months or so while my old supervisor is out on maternity leave.
I am surprisingly unhappy about this. I should be elated. I only have two actual reactions to this, though:
1. Moderate shame- that is, since I've not had a job since then (a full SIX MONTHS unemployed- half a year!), going back there just makes me feel like a failure. This is irrational, but feelings don't have to make sense.
2. Resolve. I want to get a job now, more than before. If just to say I've been bouncing around from place to place and keeping busy, as opposed to mostly just feeling depressed as I burn through my savings, as I have been.
Happiness was not on the menu.
This is only somewhat related but completely relevant in a way:
There's this thing about other people telling you how to feel, how to think. This always has a negative connotation- it's the outcry of someone trying not to be conformist. Or a complaint of parents of college students that some weirdo professor is telling them how to think.
I'm going to play a word game here, but I realized not long ago, I totally need to be told how to think. Not told, but taught. I mean taught in the sense that you are taught how to read, how to do math, etc. Though, I suppose it would be more accurate (and unfortunately more in tune with my nature as it is) to say that I need to learn.
It is sort of the basis of logic and reason that you have to understand that A follows from B, while not getting caught up in
logical fallacies... In short, that there are guidelines for reason.
My thoughts (moreso my feelings but I
feel less inclined to question those- ha) are sort of scattered and all over the place. I obsess over things that don't really mean much, I ignore and forget the biggest problems in my life routinely (daily, even with rather high stakes). I'm lost in imaginary conversations that might happen with people who I may never speak to/again, and daydreams of things I've no plans to actually do- even when I should. I am not a good thinker.
Now, I can ruminate about things, and when I do make actual deliberate decisions I think they stand up pretty well. My intellect, while not really impressive (I'm not a very well-educated person), is not really the issue. It's how my thoughts are ordered, the things I think about, etc... My problems are systematic.
If I were a computer... The hardware is OK, but I could use a new Operating System. Actually, I could use a memory upgrade, personally...but you get what I mean.
Another analogy would be to say that I am
farsighted (though not very forward-thinking and certainly not possessing of a great deal of foresight)- things not my own seem relatively clear, but my own thoguhts, the hurricane of words and feelings that swirls around in my head, knocking over my plans intentions, has never been especially clear. And less so, these days. There was another metaphor in there, but again, I hope you can see what I'm getting at.
Another tangentially-related thought I had today... Positive thinking, at least, in some people, can happen by accident. It occurred to me that I and people generally would be happier if we thought about the things we can do and are able to do, as opposed to thinking about the things we can't do. This is especially relevant to career aptitude, but I suppose can be applied more broadly. If you find yourself thinking about getting better at the things you do well, you'll be inclined to do them. With me, if I find myself doing the opposite, it's like some sort of inverse masturbation, like something I find myself doing just to end up feeling worse.
Because what you think about affects how you feel, of course.
On that note, something very old, that I mentioned earlier:
https://rcpt.yousendit.com/811056550/1971c97649e7b0a64b5093a4a33b621bThis is As a Man Thinketh, a book I mentioned in
an earlier blog post. My mom bought me the audiobook (access to an MP3, really) as well as some other stuff that I haven't bothered to listen to, but shows much less promise. The verbiage is a little outdated since the book was written in 1906 or something, and it is sometimes overly simple...but I like it. It's not so new-agey as it sounds from the introduction, though I should state that is a philosophical thing, and therefore offers no actual answers per se. But it's a nice listen.
Then again, I've always believed it's not so much what you hear, as when you hear it.